Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Infantry Battalions"
From Linking experiences of World War One
m (Discussing categories) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: On Wikipedia itself I get the impression that category pages are limited for the sake of the reader rather than the server these days. | :: On Wikipedia itself I get the impression that category pages are limited for the sake of the reader rather than the server these days. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Should we keep this as a parent category that only contains child categories, not pages, with the actual pages only in the national child categories?--[[User:GavinRobinson|GavinRobinson]] ([[User talk:GavinRobinson|talk]]) 03:52, 6 December 2014 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 04:52, 6 December 2014
I've started on unit type categories but need more research to get size categories right. I have a vague memory that Your Archives had trouble with large categories making it hard to find child categories, but that was a much older version of MediaWiki.--GavinRobinson (talk) 10:24, 11 November 2014 (PST)
- Thanks Gavin! I've started using your [[Category:British_Infantry_Battalions]] and also started [[Category:Battalions_with_official_diaries]]. Similarly, I'll start using [[Category:Battalions_with_personal_narratives]] too.
- On Wikipedia itself I get the impression that category pages are limited for the sake of the reader rather than the server these days.
Should we keep this as a parent category that only contains child categories, not pages, with the actual pages only in the national child categories?--GavinRobinson (talk) 03:52, 6 December 2014 (PST)
